Warning: Table 'watchdog' was not locked with LOCK TABLES query: INSERT INTO watchdog (uid, type, message, severity, link, location, referer, hostname, timestamp) VALUES (0, 'php', '<em>Incorrect key file for table &amp;#039;./iawm/cache_filter.MYI&amp;#039;; try to repair it\nquery: UPDATE cache_filter SET data = &amp;#039;&amp;lt;form method=\\&amp;quot;post\\&amp;quot; action=\\&amp;quot;https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr\\&amp;quot;&amp;gt;\\n &amp;lt;input type=\\&amp;quot;hidden\\&amp;quot; value=\\&amp;quot;_xclick\\&amp;quot; name=\\&amp;quot;cmd\\&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;input type=\\&amp;quot;hidden\\&amp;quot; value=\\&amp;quot;treasurer@irishantiwar.org\\&amp;quot; name=\\&amp;quot;business\\&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;input type=\\&amp;quot;hidden\\&amp;quot; name=\\&amp;quot;amount\\&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;input type=\\&amp;quot in /var/www/iawm/drupal/includes/database.mysql.inc on line 172
Syria | The Irish Anti-War Movement


The orgy of hypocrisy over Syria is a stepping stone to more war says George Galloway - Morning Star 11 February 2012

The orgy of hypocrisy over Syria is a stepping stone to more war says George Galloway
12 February 2012     George Galloway     Middle East and North Africa

If you fear the possibility of the war with Iran, says George Galloway, then the time is now to stand against the propaganda, meddling and drive for intervention over Syria and across the Middle East.
Share |

By George Galloway
Morning Star
11 February 2012
The orgy of hypocrisy in Western capitals over the UN vote on Syria this week was a fitting response from that quarter to the stomach-churning scenes from the incipient civil war in Syria.
How dare the Russians and Chinese vote No, they said,

seemingly oblivious to the scores of No votes, vetoes, cast by the US and its allies not only against attempts at progress in the Middle East and criticism of Israel but ranging from rejecting measures to bring food security to billions of people on the planet to ending the occupation of East Timor.

I can do no better than to point you to two pieces of journalism that cut through this hypocrisy and with razor-sharp intellect explain what stands behind it to make the clear case against the build-up for war in the Middle East - against Iran and, by proxy, through manifold intervention in Syria.

The Star's leader on Monday should go down as one of the most prescient and timely editorials this paper has ever published in its long history. And - if the editor will forgive the indiscretion of citing another publication - Seamus Milne in the Guardian on Wednesday forensically tore away the propaganda campaign of those who seek to exploit the suffering in Syria to advance a policy of, well, securing US "leadership" in the 21st century.

Syria: 'True freedom is without fear' - Martin Chulov near Homs guardian.co.uk, Friday 10 February 201

Syria: 'True freedom is without fear'
In a town near Homs residents walk a fine line every Friday between fear of the Assad regime and the courage to fight it

Martin Chulov near Homs
guardian.co.uk, Friday 10 February 2012 19.49 GMT

A Syrian woman is masked in the colours of the revolutionary flag during a protest march. Photograph: Anonymous/AP
Just after noon in this rebel-held Syrian town, demonstrators took to the streets to denounce the regime of Bashar al-Assad, as they have done every Friday for the last 11 months.

There were small groups of men at first, emerging silently from mosques, homes and alleyways, then converging like a shoal of fish as they neared the main square. The gathering masses chanted as they walked. Each taunt towards Assad and the Syrian power they so despise seemed to empower the crowd, by now more than 1,000 strong and bellowing to the heavens.

The people were keen to note that the Syrian army, only a few kilometres away, did not dare come after them. And they were just as eager to stress that things are very different up the road in Homs, where Syrian troops on Friday closed in on the rebel-held areas they had bombarded for the past week.

"I called my family in Baba Amr [in the south-east of Homs] now," one man said. The network had come to life minutes earlier after not working for more than a fortnight. "The situation there is terrible," he said. "There are tanks near Baba Amr in places that they had never reached before."

Another man said the situation was even more bleak. "They have entered Baba Amr, my brother told me from his house there."

Syria: truth is the first casualty. Michael Jansen - Irish Times, 110212.

Syria: truth is the first casualty



SYRIA IS SUSPENDED between civic peace and civil war. Syrians who live together in harmony in the country’s main cities of Damascus and Aleppo have, in areas torched by rebellion, become bitter enemies confronting each other across urban front lines.

Five ways to solve the crisis in Syria: Stop the War's reply to the Guardian

Five ways to solve the crisis in Syria: Stop the War's reply to the Guardian
11 February 2012     Chris Nineham     Middle East and North Africa

By Chris Nineham
Stop the War Coalition
9 February 2012

The Guardian newspaper asked Stop the War to comment on five different ways the outside world could respond to the crisis in Syria. Chris Nineham, national officer of Stop the War, gives our reply.

Full-scale military intervention
Up to a million Iraqis lost their lives as a result of western intervention. The same people who backed that war are now pressing for further war. The Nato bombing of Libya increased the killing of civilians. National Transitional Council sources in Libya themselves admit that while between 1,000 and 2,000 people died before the intervention, around 10 times that many died after Nato became involved. Libya remains in a state close to chaos with the civil war intensifying since the fall of Tripoli. If this is the advert for humanitarian bombing, there is something wrong with the product. Given the utter disaster caused by western intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq it is amazing that this option is even being contemplated.

Safe zones and humanitarian corridor
The reality is safe zones and humanitarian corridors have to be enforced militarily. They involve foreign tanks on the ground or fighters in the air and most likely both. This means a military violation of Syria's sovereignty: in other words, an internationalisation of the conflict, which is one of the things most commentators are rightly terrified of. In the Libyan case, the misnamed "no fly zones" - really zones in which only foreign fighter planes are tolerated - morphed in to a massive bombing campaign without even one western plane being attacked.

Jim Roche of IAWM on Syria...

Syria: what can be done? Five commentators discuss the merits of five ways in which the outside world could respond to Syria's c

Syria: what can be done?
Five commentators discuss the merits of five ways in which the outside world could respond to Syria's crisis

Abdel Bari Atwan, Michael Weiss, Seumas Milne, Shashank Joshi and Mehdi Hasan
guardian.co.uk, Friday 10 February 2012 10.30 GMT

1. Full-scale military intervention?

Abdel Bari Atwan I am opposed to military intervention by the west. Syria is not Libya, the army is well-armed and equipped with sophisticated weaponry. We would witness catastrophic civilian casualties. We have already seen the disasters caused by such intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan. In addition, the dangers of an internationalisation of the conflict are too great, with Russia, Iran and possibly China standing with Syria and Hezbollah against Nato and Israel. Such action would need a UN resolution which is clearly not forthcoming given Russia and China vetoed the last attempt to condemn Assad.

Michael Weiss A "full-scale intervention" needs to be properly defined first. Does that mean a US ground assault into Damascus? Occupation? Frankly, I don't know anyone in the pro-intervention camp who advocates such a plan. However, we should be clear about the aim of any use of force in Syria at this stage: this will only end with the removal of Bashar al-Assad from power, as that is now the stated policy of western governments, Turkey and the Arab League.

Seumas Milne A direct invasion of Syria to topple the regime would be another disaster on the Iraq or Afghanistan model, lead to a catastrophic loss of life, trigger a long-running guerrilla war, draw in armed groups from neighbouring states and Iran against another western military occupation of an Arab, Muslim state. Fortunately, there is currently no significant support for such a course.

Syndicate content